You've seen the 47-page PDF. Dozens of findings, color-coded severity labels, and zero guidance on what to actually change in your code. You forward it to your developer. They ask: “What do you want me to do with this?”
The Priority-Page Audit is different. It records exactly what was analyzed, what failed, and what the crawl cap left unchecked — with evidence and actionable fixes for checked findings.
Illustrative report data below uses the same rule version and the same 8 analyzed URLs. It does not claim traffic or revenue impact.
Homepage captured over HTTP
Viewport tag absent on analyzed pages
Non-empty title text missing
Mobile Lighthouse LCP measured at 4.2s
6 current rule-family findings verified as resolved
No current score-bearing findings remain
Same 8 URLs analyzed under the same rules
2 discovered URLs remain outside the crawl cap
Coverage
8 / 10
Analyzed URLs
Rule Set
Same
Comparable
Verified
6
Resolved findings
Still Open
0
Current rules
The current score includes six rule families across Technical and On-Page SEO. A dimension contributes only when its checks run; dimensions without current checks are excluded, not passed.
HTTPS, per-page viewport presence, and available mobile Lighthouse performance, LCP, and CLS lab measurements.
Non-empty HTML title text on each analyzed page. Length, uniqueness, descriptions, and headings are not currently score-bearing.
A scored, evidence-backed action plan — not a generic checklist.
Overall Score
example-store.com
8 analyzed · 2 not checked · 2 assessed dimensions
Dimension Scores
Sample Finding
Observed on /products
Evidence
<head>
<!-- No non-empty <title> text captured -->
</head>Fix — paste this
<head>
<title>Products | Example Store</title>
</head>Repair Queue (by impact)
Missing document title
1 page affected
Missing viewport meta tag
3 pages affected
Mobile Lighthouse LCP above 4.0s
1 page affected
Enter a URL and the crawler analyzes up to 10 priority pages, recording attempted, analyzed, failed, and cap-limited URLs.
When processing completes, receive a scored report with coverage, source evidence, severity, confidence, and actionable fix guidance.
Work through the repair queue, then re-scan. Only findings checked under comparable rules can become resolved; others remain open or not checked.
Close more retainers by showing prospects exactly what is broken and proving you can fix it. Re-scan after repairs to demonstrate results.
Deliver evidence-backed audit reports with explicit scope, prioritized actions, and a reviewable verification trail.
Get evidence-backed implementation guidance, with code only where a deterministic edit is safe. Prioritize by audit severity so engineering sprints address the clearest measured issues first.
The Quick Fix checks one URL. The Priority-Page Audit follows internal links up to a 10-page cap and reports every unattempted or failed URL.
| Priority-Page Audit | Quick Fix | |
|---|---|---|
| Pages analyzed | Up to 10 | 1 page |
| Scored dimensions | Technical + On-Page when assessed | Single-URL Technical + On-Page checks |
| Coverage truth | Analyzed, failed, and cap-limited | Single URL |
| Evidence included | Source evidence for checked findings | Key issues only |
| Fix guidance | Finding-specific actions | Top priority actions |
| Repair queue | Prioritized by impact | N/A |
| AI readiness | Purpose-specific crawler policy + source evidence | Not assessed |
| Core Web Vitals | Detailed breakdown | Available mobile Lighthouse LCP/CLS lab values |
| Delivery | HTML email report | HTML email report |
These examples explain product states; they are not customer results or performance claims.
Example · established organization
A capped audit identifies a supported technical finding on an analyzed priority page and freezes its Evidence Passport.
The Agency records its decision and implementation claim separately, with finding-specific guidance for the responsible person.
Only a comparable re-scan can mark the finding resolved; a failed or non-comparable check remains not checked.
Example · newly launched site
The coverage ledger shows which eligible URLs were discovered, attempted, analyzed, failed, or left beyond the crawl cap.
The Agency prioritizes included findings without representing excluded or unscanned pages as clean.
A publication freezes the exact analyzed scope and never turns that evidence into a ranking or traffic forecast.
Example · multi-stakeholder delivery
The internal queue separates scanner findings from Agency judgment, assignment, and execution claims.
An Owner approves an exact draft revision and publishes no more than three clearly scoped next actions.
The immutable Hosted and PDF snapshot preserves those claims and their provenance for the End client.
This form records interest; it does not start a trial or paid subscription. Completed audits state their coverage and keep resolved, still-open, and not-checked outcomes separate.