You've seen the 47-page PDF. Dozens of findings, color-coded severity labels, and zero guidance on what to actually change in your code. You forward it to your developer. They ask: “What do you want me to do with this?”
The Priority-Page Audit is different. It records exactly what was analyzed, what failed, and what the crawl cap left unchecked — with evidence and actionable fixes for checked findings.
Illustrative report data below uses the same rule version and the same 8 analyzed URLs. It does not claim traffic or revenue impact.
3 critical issues blocking indexing
12 images without alt text
No structured data on any page
LCP 4.2s on mobile homepage
3 findings verified as resolved
2 findings remain open
Same 8 URLs analyzed under the same rules
2 discovered URLs remain outside the crawl cap
Coverage
8 / 10
Analyzed URLs
Rule Set
Same
Comparable
Verified
3
Resolved findings
Still Open
2
Needs action
50+ checks organized into 10 categories. Checked findings preserve source evidence, confidence, rule version, and actionable guidance.
Robots.txt, canonical tags, redirect chains, and crawl traps.
Meta robots, noindex signals, sitemap presence, and orphan pages.
Title, description, OG tags, Twitter cards, and duplicate detection.
Thin pages, duplicate content, keyword stuffing, and readability.
H1 presence, hierarchy violations, missing headings, and nesting.
Missing alt text, oversized files, broken sources, and lazy loading.
Missing structured data, validation errors, and coverage gaps.
Mixed content, certificate issues, HSTS, and insecure resources.
Core Web Vitals, render-blocking resources, and LCP optimization.
E-E-A-T signals, AI citability, and LLM visibility assessment.
A scored, evidence-backed action plan — not a generic checklist.
Overall Score
example-store.com
8 analyzed · 2 not checked · 50+ checks
Dimension Scores
Sample Finding
Affects 3 pages: /, /products, /about
Evidence
<body>
<div class="header">...</div>
<!-- No <h1> found -->
<h2>Welcome to Store</h2>Fix — paste this
<h1>Premium Products | Store</h1>
<h2>Welcome to Store</h2>Repair Queue (by impact)
Missing H1 on 3 pages
3 pages affected
Images without alt text
6 pages affected
Duplicate meta descriptions
5 pages affected
Enter a URL and the crawler analyzes up to 10 priority pages, recording attempted, analyzed, failed, and cap-limited URLs.
When processing completes, receive a scored report with coverage, source evidence, severity, confidence, and actionable fix guidance.
Work through the repair queue, then re-scan. Only findings checked under comparable rules can become resolved; others remain open or not checked.
Close more retainers by showing prospects exactly what is broken and proving you can fix it. Re-scan after repairs to demonstrate results.
Deliver evidence-backed audit reports with explicit scope, prioritized actions, and a reviewable verification trail.
Get dev-ready fix code instead of vague recommendations. Prioritize by severity so engineering sprints target the highest-impact issues first.
The Quick Fix checks one URL. The Priority-Page Audit follows internal links up to a 10-page cap and reports every unattempted or failed URL.
| Priority-Page Audit | Quick Fix | |
|---|---|---|
| Pages analyzed | Up to 10 | 1 page |
| Checks run | 50+ | Core checks |
| Coverage truth | Analyzed, failed, and cap-limited | Single URL |
| Evidence included | Source evidence for checked findings | Key issues only |
| Fix guidance | Finding-specific actions | Top priority actions |
| Repair queue | Prioritized by impact | N/A |
| AI readiness | Observed crawler-access + citability signals | Basic assessment |
| Core Web Vitals | Detailed breakdown | Summary score |
| Delivery | HTML email report | HTML email report |
These examples explain product states; they are not customer results or performance claims.
Example · established organization
A capped audit identifies a supported technical finding on an analyzed priority page and freezes its Evidence Passport.
The Agency records its decision and implementation claim separately, with finding-specific guidance for the responsible person.
Only a comparable re-scan can mark the finding resolved; a failed or non-comparable check remains not checked.
Example · newly launched site
The coverage ledger shows which eligible URLs were discovered, attempted, analyzed, failed, or left beyond the crawl cap.
The Agency prioritizes included findings without representing excluded or unscanned pages as clean.
A publication freezes the exact analyzed scope and never turns that evidence into a ranking or traffic forecast.
Example · multi-stakeholder delivery
The internal queue separates scanner findings from Agency judgment, assignment, and execution claims.
An Owner approves an exact draft revision and publishes no more than three clearly scoped next actions.
The immutable Hosted and PDF snapshot preserves those claims and their provenance for the End client.
This form records interest; it does not start a trial or paid subscription. Completed audits state their coverage and keep resolved, still-open, and not-checked outcomes separate.